On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 07:45:00PM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Ben -
>
> Top posting the open issues - as I think there are only two.
>
> Issue #1
>
> > > What is the scope over which the user-defined application bits are
> > > defined/allocated?
> >
>
> LES: User defined
Support the adoption of the draft.
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Melchior Aelmans
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:07 PM
To: Christian Hopps
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for
Hi Deborah,
Point of process…
From: Deborah Brungard
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 at 7:15 PM
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , The IESG
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org" ,
"lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" ,
Acee Lindem , Alvaro Retana
Subject: RE: Deborah Brungard's Discuss on
Support the adoption.
Thanks,
Sandy
原始邮件
发件人：ChristianHopps
收件人：lsr@ietf.org ;
抄送人：lsr-cha...@ietf.org ;lsr-...@ietf.org
;Christian Hopps ;
日 期 ：2020年06月11日 03:29
主 题 ：[Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
This begins a 2 week WG adoption call
Hi Les,
On my Discuss, that’s good.
On my comments, I’m still confused then on the scope of the draft. If it was
(2) below only, it would seem that this is an extension of current capabilities
(my first reading). Considering (1), “unambiguously”, and the use of the terms
“legacy” and “all
yes/support the adoption
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 11, 2020, 12:04 PM -0700, Jordan Head
, wrote:
> Support.
>
> The draft identifies and addresses the problem, and quite cleanly I might add.
>
> Jordan Head
>
> On 6/10/20, 3:29 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" on behalf of cho...@chopps.org>
Ben -
Top posting the open issues - as I think there are only two.
Issue #1
> > What is the scope over which the user-defined application bits are
> > defined/allocated?
>
LES: User defined applications are - by definition - outside the scope of this
document/standardization.
We have simply
Getting back to the comment section (inline)...
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:48:00PM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Benjamin -
>
>
>
> Thanx for your review.
>
> Responses inline.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> > From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
>
> > Sent:
Hi Rob,
On 12/06/2020 11:21, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
Hi Peter,
Cutting the response to just the text in question.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak
Sent: 12 June 2020 09:25
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; Alvaro Retana
Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) ; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-
Hi Peter,
Cutting the response to just the text in question.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Psenak
> Sent: 12 June 2020 09:25
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; Alvaro Retana
>
> Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) ; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-
> re...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
Hi Rob,
On 11/06/2020 15:39, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
Hi Peter,
Please see inline ...
I think that there is probably just one point of confusion/ambiguity that needs
to be resolved.
yes, agree, please see inline (##PP):
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak
Sent: 11 June
11 matches
Mail list logo
