Speaking as WG chair:
There has been considerable support for this document. However, there has also
been objections to the document. The objections are either that there is
nothing to standardize given that all pieces exist and that the MT isn’t a
viable option for VTNs since it isn’t
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP2):
On 16/03/2021 21:33, Alvaro Retana wrote:
On March 11, 2021 at 5:46:51 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
thanks for the review, please see inline (##PP):
It looks like you didn't get the whole review (Outlook bug). Take a
look at it here: