Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-instance-02

2021-05-04 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Speaking as co-author, I support WG adoption, and I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Yingzhen > On May 2, 2021, at 1:39 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > >

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-instance-02

2021-05-04 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as co-author, I'm not aware of any IPR applying to the draft. I also support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 5/2/21, 4:47 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote: This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14

2021-05-04 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Yaron, thanks for your comments I'll address them in the next version of the document. thanks, Peter On 03/05/2021 14:56, Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer Review result: Ready This document specifies extensions (TLVs, sub-TLVs etc.) to IS-IS in support of