[Lsr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8920 (6631)

2021-07-05 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8920, "OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6631 -- Type: Technical Reported by:

[Lsr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8919 (6630)

2021-07-05 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8919, "IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6630 -- Type: Technical Reported by:

Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2021-07-05 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Peter, On 7/5/21, 4:05 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote: Hi Shraddha, On 05/07/2021 06:44, Shraddha Hegde wrote: > I support progressing this draft. > > I have a minor comment on the Flags sub-TLV. > > In section “ISIS Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”

Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2021-07-05 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
The second WG last call has ended. There is considerable support for publication and a few minor comments. The most significant comments resulted in an errata to RFC 8919. I will work on the shepherd’s writeup and will request publication of the updated revision. Thanks, Acee From: Acee

Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2021-07-05 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Shraddha, On 05/07/2021 06:44, Shraddha Hegde wrote: I support progressing this draft. I have a minor comment on the Flags sub-TLV. In section “ISIS Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV” And  “OSPF Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV” We should add an explicit statement