[Lsr] Seeking feedback to the revised draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute

LSR experts, We have revised the draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute to address the comments and feedback from IETF 112. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute/ In a nutshell, the proposed solution * advertises the "Site-Cost" via IP prefix reachability TLV

Re: [Lsr] BGP vs PUA/PULSE

Thanks Bruno for the reference and clarification. Gyan On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:02 AM wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > > > Please see inline [Bruno] > > > > > > Orange Restricted > > *From:* Gyan Mishra > *Sent:* Thursday, January 6, 2022 7:52 PM > *To:* DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET > *Cc:* Aijun Wang ;

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02

Hi Everyone, I read the draft and support its adoption. Best Regards, Linda Dunbar From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>> Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 1:58 AM To: lsr@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] BGP vs PUA/PULSE

Robert, On 06/01/2022 12:31, Robert Raszuk wrote: Peter, So far you and others have been saying all along that one of the applications which uses PULSE can be BGP. If so I am afraid this is not PIC (== Prefix _Independent _Convergence) anymore. And I think this was Bruno's valid point.