Robert,
In the new version of the draft, we have:
“The aggregated site cost associated with a prefix (i.e., ANYCAST prefix) can
be a value configured on the router to which the prefix is attached. The
aggregated site cost can be computed based on an algorithm configured on router
for specific
Hi, Tony:
If we use pub/sub mechanism, why don't we accomplish it via the management
system, or controller?
No IGP extension needed then.
Also no pressure for the ABR to keep the RDB(Registration Database) and the
TCP/QUIC server connections
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
FYI. This is a better alternative that PUA/Pulse.
Tony
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-lsr-liveness-00.txt
> Date: January 18, 2022 at 5:04:22 PM PST
> To: , "Tony Li"
>
>
> A new version of I-D,
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement
Authors : Shaofu Peng
Ran
