Re: [Lsr] Question on "Advertisement of Dedicated Metric for Flexible Algorithm in IGP"

Hi, Aijun: Thank you for the clarification of FAPM sub-TLV. Really helpful :-) Hi, Acee: Thank you for the review and comment. why you couldn’t just use the algorithm-specific metric in section 8 and 9 and draft-ietf-lsir-flex-algo About the FAPM sub-TLV, I agree with Aijun that it’s

[Lsr] 答复: Question on "Advertisement of Dedicated Metric for Flexible Algorithm in IGP"

Hi, Aijun: Thank you for the clarification of FAPM sub-TLV. Really helpful :-) Hi, Acee: Thank you for the review and comment. why you couldn’t just use the algorithm-specific metric in section 8 and 9 and draft-ietf-lsir-flex-algo About the FAPM sub-TLV, I agree with Aijun that it’s

Re: [Lsr] Question on "Advertisement of Dedicated Metric for Flexible Algorithm in IGP"

Hi, Acee: The Sub-TLV described in Section 8 and section 9 of the draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo is for Prefix Metric, not for Link Metric. Such sub-TLV is carried with the prefix advertisement. Will you change the name and application scope of such Sub-TLV? Currently, the name is “IS-IS

Re: [Lsr] LSR IETF 113 Agenda Published

Hi LSR Presenters, Please email your slides to lsr-cha...@ietf.org ASAP. Thanks, Yingzhen > On Mar 7, 2022, at 8:14 PM, Yingzhen Qu wrote: > > Hi, > > The LSR agenda for IETF 113 has been published: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/session/lsr >

[Lsr] Question on "Advertisement of Dedicated Metric for Flexible Algorithm in IGP"

Speaking as WG member: Hi Co-authors, I’m read this draft and I really don’t see why you couldn’t just use the algorithm-specific metric in section 8 and 9 and draft-ietf-lsir-flex-algo? It seems to me that the use case is fairly obscure and there is nothing to prevent usage of these metrics