A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS YANG Model Augmentations for Additional
Features - Version 1
Authors : Acee Lindem
Hi Ketan, John,
First of all, I think this IANA OSPFv3 Extended-LSA Sub-TLV specification, if
it is to be done at all, should be done in a separate draft.
When we originally created the registry for RFC 8362, the purpose was avoid
Sub-TLV code point collisions while affording maximum reuse of
Thanks Qin, modulo a few remaining editorial nits (that can be taken care of by
the RFC editor if need be) this looks ready to me; I’ve requested IETF last
call.
—John
> On Sep 5, 2022, at 9:22 AM, Qin Wu
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, John:
> The v-10 is posted, see our diff below:
>
Last Call Request has been submitted for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
IESG state changed:
New State: Last Call Requested
(The previous state was AD Evaluation::AD Followup)
Datatracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
Hi John,
Please check inline below with KT for a quick clarification.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 8:39 PM John Scudder wrote:
> Hi Ketan,
>
> Seems like a good plan. Comments below.
>
> > On Sep 5, 2022, at 3:31 AM, Ketan Talaulikar
> wrote:
> >
> > I am personally OK with adopting the "boy
Hi Ketan,
Seems like a good plan. Comments below.
> On Sep 5, 2022, at 3:31 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
>
> I am personally OK with adopting the "boy scout" approach here - even if it
> might be seen as a scope creep.
>
> Following is a proposal for feedback from you and the WG:
>
> We'll
Hi, John:
The v-10 is posted, see our diff below:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-10
-Qin (on behalf of authors)
-邮件原件-
发件人: John Scudder [mailto:jgs=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org]
发送时间: 2022年9月5日 2:38
收件人: Qin Wu
抄送:
A new version (-10) has been submitted for
draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-10.txt
Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in
PCE discovery
Authors : Diego R. Lopez
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IGP Flexible Algorithm
Authors : Peter Psenak
Shraddha Hegde
Hi John,
I am personally OK with adopting the "boy scout" approach here - even if it
might be seen as a scope creep.
Following is a proposal for feedback from you and the WG:
We'll first need 9 columns in the "OSPFv3 Extended-LSAs Sub-TLVs" registry
at this point to indicate the applicability
Thanks John.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 11:32 PM John Scudder wrote:
> LGTM. IETF LC requested.
>
> —John
>
> > On Sep 3, 2022, at 4:51 AM, Ketan Talaulikar
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for your quick response and please check
Thanks John.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 11:31 PM John Scudder wrote:
> Thanks, Ketan. Enough tweaking :-), I’ve requested it move to IETF last
> call.
>
> —John
>
> > On Sep 3, 2022, at 5:03 AM, Ketan Talaulikar
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >
> >
> > Hi John,
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
