Rob -
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:07 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org;
> cho...@chopps.org; t...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
>
Alvaro -
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 6:06 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org;
> cho...@chopps.org; t...@ietf.org
> Subject: Alvaro
Top posting here - and my response applies to the discussion between Eric,
John, and Tom regarding Section 3.1 (and also to Alvaro - though I will reply
directly to Alvaro's email as he has some specific questions not covered in the
discussion below...)
The text in Section 3.1 is currently:
"
Venkat –
First, you really should be looking at RFC 7794 – the use of R,N flags in
prefix-sid sub-tlv only exists for backwards compatibility with early
implementation of SR-MPLS.
The proper place to set/read these flags is in the prefix-attributes sub-TLV as
they have meaning even when SR is
Sabrina -
I approve the registration for the X-bit as defined in Section 18.4.9 in the
draft.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 1:57 PM
> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; cho...@chopps.org;
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [IANA
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Flood Reflection
Authors : Tony Przygienda
Chris Bowers
We will have an interim working group meeting tomorrow (Sept 21st, 2022) from
14:00 UTC to 16:00 UTC.
Here is the official information link:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-lsr-01/session/lsr
Themes for this interim are IGP flex algorithm and SRv6 advertisement.
Reviewer: Steve Hanna
Review result: Ready
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort
to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were
written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors. Document
authors, document
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your review and please check inline below for responses.
The changes as discussed below will be updated in the next version of the
document.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:22 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Thanks Martin - Thanks for the Routing Directorate review!!
>
>
>
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Hello experts,
Could you please help me to clarify the points below ?
1. Is it valid to set N-Flag in "prefix-sid" sub-tlv for redistributed
routes.
2. if not valid, then what should be the receiver behavior when it
receives a prefix with R set in "prefix-sid" sub-tlv
Regards,
Venkat.
Please DO NOT reply to this email.
I-D:
Datatracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to
Waiting for Writeup.
___
Lsr mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
