> On 16 May 2023, at 10:25, Peter Psenak <ppse...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Yoav,
>
> thanks for comments, please see inline:
>
>
> On 15/05/2023 21:36, Yoav Nir via Datatracker wrote:
>> Reviewer: Yoav Nir
>> Review result: Has Nits
>> Hi.
>> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
>> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
>> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
>> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
>> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>> I am no expert on routing in general or IGP flex algorithms in particular.
>> That
>> said, I found the Abstract and Introduction jarring. The first paragraph of
>> the
>> Abstract would be better as part of the introduction than the abstract.
>
> I moved the first paragraph from Abstract to Introduction.
Sounds good.
>
>> The Security Considerations section seems mostly copy-pasted from RFC 9350
>> with
>> mild editing. The substance may be correct - that the only new attack
>> possible
>> is suppressing reachability for a prefix, but I think only the second
>> paragraph
>> is necessary for that.
>
> I would prefer to keep the first paragraph.
OK.
Yoav
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr