You say they are unnecessary, then why do we have vendors doing this wrong and
pointing to this requirement of the RFC as their reason for doing so?
While there may be a valid argument that they shouldn’t be necessary, I would
argue that real world implementation experience suggests that they
Given that the context of the “Interface MTU” is specifically the “interface
MTU” field in OSPFv3 Database Description packets and OSPF virtual links (RFC
2328), the additions recommended in this Errata are unnecessary. The Errata
should be rejected.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Sep 17, 2023, at 15:58,
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5838,
"Support of Address Families in OSPFv3".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7644
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Owen
