Hi Russ,
Thanks for the review. See inline.
> On Mar 16, 2024, at 16:51, r...@riw.us wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
> Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
> they pass through IETF las
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-17.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title: Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Prefix Administrative Tags
Authors: Acee Lindem
Peter Psenak
Yingzhen Qu
Name:dr
Speaking as WG member:
Co-Authors,
I see you have a slot at the LSR meeting on Thursday to present the subject
draft.
I believe this document is misguided. You shouldn't need to advertise protected
prefixes. If you are doing Source Address Validation for intra-domain sources,
why wouldn't y
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-08.txt is now available. It is
a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title: Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints
Authors: Shraddha Hegde
William Britto A J
Rajesh Shetty
Acee,
I read your comment about elephant flow and added below text in sec 4.1.1.2
“Note that a single elephant flow is normally
pinned to a single layer-3 interface. If the single layer-3 link
bandwidth is not sufficient for any single elephant flow, the mechanisms
to solve this issue ar
Hi all,
draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce mentions BGP PIC edge as one the
use cases for UPA in the presence of summarization. However, it is not
quite clear whether UPA is expected to trigger BGP best path calculation at
the ingress PE (in addition to triggering BGP PIC) in spite of the B
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-02.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title: IGP Flexible Algorithms Reverse Affinity Constraint
Authors: Peter Psenak
Jakub Horn
Amit Dhamija
Name: