I support the publication of the draft. It is happy to see SRv6 basic drafts
are going to be published step by step, it helps the industry very much.
Respect,
Cheng
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2022 1:17 AM
To: lsr
Cc:
Hi
This is a useful document, and it looks mature to me though it is very short,
so I support the adoption.
Thanks,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 2:59 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc:
+1. PMTU info can be collected in Non-IGP scenarios, we can do the work in
parallel.
Cheng
From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 10:00 PM
To: Jeff Tantsura
Cc: i...@ietf.org; Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) ;
lsr@ietf.org; Susan Hares
Hi authors,
When I read the document, I noticed that the format of the SRv6 SID Structure
Sub-Sub-TLV has no reserved bits, which may bring troubles for future
extensions.
What if new architecture of SID is proposed? We have to introduce a new SID
structure TLV. But actually a
Support. This draft is one of the most important draft of SRv6, which defines
the ISIS extensions for SRv6.
I think this draft is well-written and ready for WG adoption.
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 9:50 PM
Hi Peter,
Please see inline.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 4:47 PM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ;
draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions: Locator Leaking
Hi Peter,
Thanks to your reply. Please see my reply inline [Cheng].
Thanks,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:26 PM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ;
draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject
Hi Authors,
In chapter 6.1 of draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-04, it mentions that
Locator TLV can be leaked from level-2 to level-1.(See D bit)
I am wondering that
1: Does the Locator can be imported another protocol? Like OSPF?
2: Will SRv6 End SID sub-TLV be carried when the locator TLV
