Re: [Lsr] [rt5.ietf.org #7080] System ID in ISIS

2022-06-16 Thread Jaideep Choudhary
an IETF draft as there is > no one actively updating ISO specs. > > > > All of this would take years – and at the end we would only have resolved > the use of a systemid for which there is no practical deployment case. > > > > I just don’t think this is worth the effort.

Re: [Lsr] [rt5.ietf.org #7080] System ID in ISIS

2022-06-14 Thread Jaideep Choudhary
d, it is easy enough > NOT to use all 0’s. > > > > HTH > > > > Les > > > > *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * Jaideep Choudhary > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2022 8:00 AM > *To:* Tony Li > *Cc:* supp...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] [rt

Re: [Lsr] [rt5.ietf.org #7080] System ID in ISIS

2022-06-14 Thread Jaideep Choudhary
appropriate for technical support. > Please contact your vendors directly. > > Tony > > > On Jun 14, 2022, at 12:12 AM, Jaideep Choudhary < > jaideepchoudhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Team, > > I would like to know, whether in IS-IS, a system id can be 000

Re: [Lsr] [rt5.ietf.org #7080] System ID in ISIS

2022-06-14 Thread Jaideep Choudhary
in inter-operability as some vendors like Cisco doesn't define a SYS-ID of .. as invalid. I would appreciate your response on this. Regards Jaideep Choudhary On Mon, 13 Jun, 2022, 11:08 pm Cindy Morgan via RT, wrote: > Hi Jaideep, > > You have reached the IETF Secretari