Re: [Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

2020-05-21 Thread Kyle Rose
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:28 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > * Update language? > > > > There are several places in which it is possible that normative language > in > > prior RFCs is revised. For example, in section 6.1, the last paragraph > states: > > > > New applications which future

[Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

2020-05-20 Thread Kyle Rose via Datatracker
Reviewer: Kyle Rose Review result: Ready with Nits This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors

Re: [Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

2019-12-09 Thread Kyle Rose
Draft 11 satisfies all points I made in my review. Thanks. Kyle On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:50 PM Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote: > Hi Kyle > > Thank you for your review > > Please see below PPE > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:47 PM Kyle Rose via Datatracker < > nore...@iet

[Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

2019-10-31 Thread Kyle Rose via Datatracker
Reviewer: Kyle Rose Review result: Ready with Nits This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors