[Lsr] some doubt about RFC 5185 (Multi Area Adjacency)

Hi ALL, About rfc5185 OSPF Multi-Area Adjacency section 2.7 Advertising Multi-Area Adjacencies: Link ID = Remote's Router ID I have the following questions: 1、 I'm not sure whether “Neighbor's IP Address” means “local interface IP address” or “remote interface IP address”. 2、If

[Lsr] 撤回: some doubt about RFC 5185 (Multi Area Adjacency)

meicong 将撤回邮件“some doubt about RFC 5185 (Multi Area Adjacency)”。 ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

[Lsr] some doubt about RFC 5185 (Multi Area Adjacency)

Hi ALL, About rfc5185 OSPF Multi-Area Adjacency section 2.7 Advertising Multi-Area Adjacencies: Link ID = Remote's Router ID I have the following questions: 1、 I'm not sure whether “Neighbor's IP Address” means “local interface IP address” or “remote interface IP address”. I

[Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

Hi All, Could you please provide clarification for following section 2.5.(3) in rfc3101. If the forwarding address is non-zero look up the forwarding address in the routing table. For a Type-5 LSA the matching routing table entry must specify an intra-area or

Re: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

router in different capable area with different netmask. It maybe fall under a configed error, but the result of the calculate result seems wrong. What is your opinion for it? Regards 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2019年12月5日 20:40 收件人: meicong ; lsr@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Lsr

[Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

Hi All, Could you please provide clarification for following section 2.5.(3) in rfc3101. If the forwarding address is non-zero look up the forwarding address in the routing table. For a Type-5 LSA the matching routing table entry must specify an intra-area or