Greetings,
We do not see the text reported in RFC 6823 but is found in RFC 823. If this
is correct, please submit a new errata referencing RFC 823. Errata #6995 will
be deleted.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/cs
> On Jun 16, 2022, at 2:12 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata
sh...@gmail.com;
> aretana.i...@gmail.com; j...@juniper.net; andrew-i...@liquid.tech;
> cho...@chopps.org; han...@gredler.at
> Cc: keepplayin...@gmail.com; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6823 (6995)
>
> This Errata should be summarily rejected as
This Errata should be summarily rejected as there is no such reference in RFC
6823. Perhaps, it was reported against the wrong RFC.
Thanks,
Acee (as WG Co-Chair)
On 6/16/22, 5:13 AM, "Lsr on behalf of RFC Errata System"
wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6823,
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6823,
"Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6995
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: keep
