[Lsr] 答复: 【Request AD Step In】 Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04

Hi, John: Thanks for your reply. The key concerns for the issue is that although https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement has several advantages, it hasn't been given the adoption call until now. This is unfair and also our main appeal reason. Considering

Re: [Lsr] 答复: 【Request AD Step In】 Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04

Hi, John: What’s your responses to this issue and my proposal then? We need your guidances. Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Sep 20, 2023, at 17:22, Aijun Wang wrote: > > Hi, Acee, John: > > My proposal to solve the issue is that we can discuss the merge possibility > for the contents and

[Lsr] 答复: 【Request AD Step In】 Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04

Hi, Tom: My appeal is that it's unfair to ignore the draft that was put forward THREE years earlier than the follower, and we devote intense discussions for this topic along the process, but there is no adoption call. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom -邮件原件- 发件人:

[Lsr] 答复: 【Request AD Step In】 Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04

Hi, Acee, John: My proposal to solve the issue is that we can discuss the merge possibility for the contents and author list of WG document at the IETF 118 on-site meeting. I think you (also LSR experts within the list) can't deny draft-ppsenk was inspired by our draft. It's unfair to ignore