Hi, Les:
Let’s top post my responses to your specific questions:
1) LAN partitioning can occur. So R1 and R2 may be able to talk to each
and R3 and R4 may be able to talk to each – but the two partitions have no
connectivity. Yet all nodes will advertise the LAN subnet – which in
And, for broadcast networks, if you can only encode them via the p2p link style, there are still the following questions:1) whether one interface can be appointed to different neighbor? Will the latter override the former? 2) The efficiency. The total neighbor information will be O(N*N), the
Hi, Les:
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表 Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg)
发送时间: 2024年1月18日 0:16
收件人: Aijun Wang
抄送: Christian Hopps ; Huzhibo ; Acee
Lindem ; Yingzhen Qu ;
lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
Hi, Robert:
For VRF interface, we can treat it specially, similar as the unnumbered
interface in the draft. (Add one “V” bit to identify them and attach the remote
identifier manually---there is no other automatic way to accomplish the
topology recovery )
But for other non-VRF interfaces,
Hi, Les:
-邮件原件-
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org]
代表 Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
发送时间: 2024年1月16日 0:16
收件人: Christian Hopps ; Huzhibo
抄送: Acee Lindem ; Yingzhen Qu
; lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
Hi, Acee:
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee
Lindem
发送时间: 2024年1月16日 6:44
收件人: Aijun Wang
抄送: Christian Hopps ; Liyan Gong
; Yingzhen Qu ; lsr
; lsr-chairs
主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes(01/05/2024
-
Hi, Chris:
For the use case A.1(inter-as topology recovery), RFC9346/RFC5392 based
solution requires the prerequisite knowledge of remote identifier on each stub
link. Considering there maybe tens/hundreds of links among the ASBRs, there is
no easy way to get such information automatically
Hi, Peter:
There is no Remote Identifiers, IPv4 Neighbor address, IPv6 Neighbor address
information on each of these stub links, unless you configure or identify
them manually.
Image there are tens of links between the inter-AS neighbors, what you think
better ways is very inefficient.
There are
Hi, Les:
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表 Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg)
发送时间: 2024年1月9日 5:03
收件人: Yingzhen Qu ; lsr ; lsr-chairs
主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
(01/05/2024 - 01/19/2024)
I oppose WG adoption.
Hi, Acee:
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee
Lindem
发送时间: 2024年1月9日 3:03
收件人: Yingzhen Qu
抄送: lsr
主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
(01/05/2024 - 01/19/2024)
Speaking as WG member:
I don’t support
Hi, All:
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to the draft.
The latest version of this draft(version-08) has made signification updates
since its earlier version(version -02).
We are seeking one general solution that can cover more scenarios, as that are
descried in Appendix A.1, A.2,
11 matches
Mail list logo
