[Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

Object its adoption. This document does not solves area/domain partition, but this is a very common scenario. From the perspective of comprehensiveness and maturity, I think https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ Draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement is a better choice. Thanks, Guoqi Xu

[Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

Hi, Acee: Please read carefully the description in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-00#section-3: "In another situation, assume the BGP session is built between Node S2 and T2, via Ps2 and Pt2 respectively. If Node S2 within area 1

[Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

Object its adoption. The reasons are the followings: 1) It is not the initial draft to describe the problem and provide the solution. 2) The problem and the explicit signaling mechanism is firstly provided by https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement/ in its