Hi All,
Thanks for the discussion and inputs. The plan proposed by John looks good
to me and we've just posted an update for the L2 Bundle member draft so it
can progress further without the IANA changes.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06
Thanks,
Ketan
On
From: John Scudder
Sent: 12 September 2022 13:47
Hi Tom,
Needless (?) to say, I’m sympathetic with your position, and thanks for
bringing up the parallel case. I take it however, that you aren’t taking the
position that this reorganization/restructuring/call it what you will needs to
be done
Hi Tom,
Needless (?) to say, I’m sympathetic with your position, and thanks for
bringing up the parallel case. I take it however, that you aren’t taking the
position that this reorganization/restructuring/call it what you will needs to
be done by draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles, though? Right
From: Lsr on behalf of John Scudder
Sent: 06 September 2022 22:04
> On Sep 6, 2022, at 5:00 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
>I guess if we do decide to either abandon the reorganization suggestion
> altogether, or to pursue it as a separate draft, then
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles
> On Sep 6, 2022, at 5:00 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
>I guess if we do decide to either abandon the reorganization suggestion
> altogether, or to pursue it as a separate draft, then
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles should just stick to its existing approach of
> listing restrictions
Speaking as WG Member and primary author of RFC 8362:
Hi John,
On 9/6/22, 1:17 PM, "John Scudder" wrote:
Hi Acee,
> On Sep 5, 2022, at 1:23 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> First of all, I think this IANA OSPFv3 Extended-LSA Sub-TLV
specification, if it is to be done at
Hi Acee,
> On Sep 5, 2022, at 1:23 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> First of all, I think this IANA OSPFv3 Extended-LSA Sub-TLV specification, if
> it is to be done at all, should be done in a separate draft.
I guess by “specification” you mean “registry reorganization”, right? I’m OK
with
;draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bund...@ietf.org"
, Acee Lindem
Subject: Re: Reorganizing OSPFv3 Extended-LSA Sub-TLVs registry [was: Re: AD
review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-04]
Hi John,
Please check inline below with KT for a quick clarification.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 8:39 PM Jo
Hi John,
Please check inline below with KT for a quick clarification.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 8:39 PM John Scudder wrote:
> Hi Ketan,
>
> Seems like a good plan. Comments below.
>
> > On Sep 5, 2022, at 3:31 AM, Ketan Talaulikar
> wrote:
> >
> > I am personally OK with adopting the "boy
Hi Ketan,
Seems like a good plan. Comments below.
> On Sep 5, 2022, at 3:31 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
>
> I am personally OK with adopting the "boy scout" approach here - even if it
> might be seen as a scope creep.
>
> Following is a proposal for feedback from you and the WG:
>
> We'll
10 matches
Mail list logo
