Barry, Les
> From: Barry Leiba
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2024 1:05 AM
>
> Indeed; given the explanation and the fact that it's copied from otherwise
> existing text, I think Les is right: just leave it as is, and thanks for
> considering and discussing my question.
Thanks for your commen
Indeed; given the explanation and the fact that it's copied from
otherwise existing text, I think Les is right: just leave it as is,
and thanks for considering and discussing my question.
Barry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 6:00 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
wrote:
>
> Bruno -
>
> Inline.
>
> > -Orig
Bruno -
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:17 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Barry Leiba
>
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org;
> sec...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Secdir
Les, Barry,
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 4:29 PM
>
> Bruno/Barry -
>
> In regards to:
>
> > > — Section 4.4 —
> > >
> >> Length: Indicates the length in octets (1-8) of the Value field. The
> >> length SHOULD be the minimum required to send all bits
Bruno/Barry -
In regards to:
> > — Section 4.4 —
> >
>> Length: Indicates the length in octets (1-8) of the Value field. The
>> length SHOULD be the minimum required to send all bits that are set.
> >
> > The SHOULD seems very odd: what would be a good reason to make it
> longer than nec
Hi Barry,
Thanks for your review, comments and proposed resolution. Much appreciated.
Please see inline [Bruno]
> From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 6:21 AM
> To: sec...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
> lsr
Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Has Issues
Only some minor things here:
— Section 3 —
Although modern implementations have not strictly adhered to the 33
millisecond interval, it is commonplace for implementations to limit
the flooding rate to the same order of magnitude similar as
