Hi Linda
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:26 PM Linda Dunbar
wrote:
> Gyan,
>
>
>
> You said:
>
> * Gyan> The Anycast environments that I have worked with architecture
> have been server clusters in data centers geographically diverse that sit
> behind a load balancer that uses a concept called HRI
Gyan,
You said:
Gyan> The Anycast environments that I have worked with architecture have been
server clusters in data centers geographically diverse that sit behind a load
balancer that uses a concept called HRI host route injection that if the
service is up the VIP is BGP advertised for the
Hi Linda
Comments in-line
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:46 PM Linda Dunbar
wrote:
> Gyan,
>
>
>
> To a router, having multiple servers with the same (ANYCAST) address
> attached to different egress routers (A-ER) is same as having multiple
> paths to reach the (ANYCAST) address.
>
>
>
> You are
Gyan,
To a router, having multiple servers with the same (ANYCAST) address attached
to different egress routers (A-ER) is same as having multiple paths to reach
the (ANYCAST) address.
You are absolutely correct that there are many tools to influence the path
section, such as the routing
Christian,
If “network fails”, the packets won’t even get into the desired App Server (or
App Layer Load Balancer).
What the draft has proposed is to add a “Tie breaker” or additional weight to
the “Best Path” selection by BGP/IGP.
There is definitely interaction among the Application
Linda and authors
Some thoughts regarding load balancing draft.
Anycast in my experience has been used predominantly in my experience
within operators networks with BGP overlay, using BGP best path selection
and most cases boils down to lowest IGP metric tie breaker shortest path
for the
Hi,
Sorry to chime in.
There are certainly some higher layer application/protocols to employ. At the
same time, there are some advantages of network layer approaches as well in my
mind.
When talking about edge computing, there are some unique characteristics. The
number of edge sites could
> On Mar 8, 2021, at 7:40 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>
> Christian,
>
> You said at LSR session today that there might be concern of network
> optimizing ANYCAST traffic to better balance among multiple App Layer Load
> Balancers.
> First of all, only the Applications that need to leverage the
Christian,
You said at LSR session today that there might be concern of network optimizing
ANYCAST traffic to better balance among multiple App Layer Load Balancers.
First of all, only the Applications that need to leverage the network condition
to balance among their multiple Load Balancers
