From: Acee Lindem
Sent: 01 January 2024 13:14
> On Dec 30, 2023, at 06:56, tom petch wrote:
>
> Going through ospf-sr-yang-25 (and no, I do not want a new version for
> Christmas!) it seems to me that RFC8666 updates, RFC8665 even if the metadata
> does not mention it.
>
> RFC8665 says
> "
> On Dec 30, 2023, at 06:56, tom petch wrote:
>
> Going through ospf-sr-yang-25 (and no, I do not want a new version for
> Christmas!) it seems to me that RFC8666 updates, RFC8665 even if the metadata
> does not mention it.
>
> RFC8665 says
> " AF: Address family for the prefix.
From: Yingzhen Qu
Sent: 30 December 2023 21:11
Hi Tom,
Sorry, but I don't understand your question. RFC8665 is for OSPFv2, and RFC8666
is for OSPFv3. While in both cases, the TLV name is "Extended Prefix Range
TLV", one is for OSPFv2 extended prefix LSA, the other may be advertised in:
Hi Tom,
Sorry, but I don't understand your question. RFC8665 is for OSPFv2, and
RFC8666 is for OSPFv3. While in both cases, the TLV name is "Extended
Prefix Range TLV", one is for OSPFv2 extended prefix LSA, the other may be
advertised in:
E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA
E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA
