, 5secs being min I’m seeing but you tell me
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Date: Monday, 1 August 2022 at 10:29
To: Antoni Przygienda , Acee Lindem (acee)
, lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Comments on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Tony –
I think you
etf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
From: Antoni Przygienda
mailto:prz=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:20 AM
To: Acee Lindem ma
probably take it verbatim like this
* Tony
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Date: Monday, 1 August 2022 at 08:28
To: Antoni Przygienda , Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
, lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
From: Antoni
From: Antoni Przygienda
Date: Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:20 AM
To: Acee Lindem , "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
, "lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03
1. Agree, we already talked about it amongst the authors. Oberve
2022 at 07:42
To: Antoni Przygienda , Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
, lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Speaking as WG member:
Hi Tony,
Great improvement to the prior version of the draft – I’d now support adoption.
My
of Antoni Przygienda
Date: Friday, July 29, 2022 at 11:32 PM
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , "lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03
No Announce: thanks, we agree
Well, given LSP flooding is unrelible as well it seems no better and no worse
No Announce: thanks, we agree
Well, given LSP flooding is unrelible as well it seems no better and no worse
if we RTX. The PSNP bits will be hanging there and I guess we have to put it on
a RTX mechanism or we rely on CSNP. Good comment.
Yes, the PSNPs are _in addition_ so yes, I agree also
