Support as a co-author
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 18 June 2018 21:37
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for OSPF LLS Extensions for Local
Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02
This begins an LSR WG last call for the subject
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Christian Hopps wrote:
Hi Authors,
Can you please respond (including the mailing list) indicating if you are
aware of any IPR relating to draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric?
I am not aware of any IPR related to the isis reverse metric draft.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail:
I’m not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Regards,
- Naiming
> On Jun 18, 2018, at 3:31 PM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Hi Authors,
>
> Can you please respond (including the mailing list) indicating if you are
> aware of any IPR relating to draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric?
>
> Thanks,
Hi Authors,
Can you please respond (including the mailing list) indicating if you are aware
of any IPR relating to draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric?
Thanks,
Chris.
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Hi Les,
Yes - the Working Group Last call has completed. We'll find a shepherd and
request publication.
Thanks,
Acee
On 6/15/18, 10:49 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" wrote:
WG chairs -
Can we consider WG last call completed? (It has been more than 3 weeks...)
Would
Hi LSR’er,
A new version of spine-leaf is-is draft is posted. The main change
is adding a new bit from ‘link-attribute’ sub-tlv to indicate there is
no need to flood out on this interface, used by the spine nodes
and for the case where the spine nodes are part of the dynamic
flooding domain.
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
Thanks
Padma
On 6/18/18, 8:48 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Peter Psenak" wrote:
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
thanks,
Peter
On 18/06/18 17:24 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Authors, LSR WG,
Speaking as WG member, I support publication of the subject document. I have
the following comments:
1. The normative text saying that the TLV MUST be included needs to be
changed from section 3.1. I’m sure you didn’t mean this since LLS itself isn’t
mandatory and this isn’t backward
This begins an LSR WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, July 3rd, 2018.
Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
thanks,
Peter
On 18/06/18 17:24 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors, LSR WG,
This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the
subject document.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id?
Hello Acee/All,
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 18 June 2018 20:55
To: lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface...@ietf.orig
Subject: [Lsr] OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement -
Authors, LSR WG,
This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the subject
document.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
Authors, LSR WG,
This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the subject
document.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
Hi Folks,
The LSR (link-state-routing) WG will be meeting on Monday, July 16, 2018 from
9:30 to 12:00 (the first WG slot of IETF 102).
Please send us (lsr-cha...@ietf.org) any requests for presentation slots.
Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
