The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7810,
"IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5486
--
Type: Editorial
Reported
Hi,
I have reviewed both of the flood reduction drafts and the draft referenced
below, draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02, seems to me to be a derivative
document inferior in quality to the draft, draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05, from
which it is derived. For example, the referenced draft fails
Hi Robert,
>> draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 allows operators to select distributed
>> mode, centralized one or static one smoothly.
>Aside from static approach can you summarize in purely technical points
>advantages your draft proposes over draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 ?
Initially, our
