Hi Les,
Please see inline.
Thank you,
Julien
Sep. 26, 2018 - ginsb...@cisco.com:
> Julien -
>
> Thanx for the additional comments.
> V17 has been published to address these - subject to my responses below.
> See Les2
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: rtg-dir On Behalf Of Julien
Hi Les,
I'm happy to leave this question to Alvaro's judgment; as you know, I
included it in the non-blocking portion of my ballot position.
I appreciated the dedication and rigor you put into your service as a DE,
and hope that all DEs can do the same.
Thanks,
Benjamin
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018
On September 27, 2018 at 6:26:57 AM, Julien Meuric (julien.meu...@orange.com)
wrote:
Hi!
It looks like the outstanding item is this one about the terminology used
in §5.
tl;dr: I think that the terminology can be slightly improved to be in line
with other documents. See suggestion at the
Julien -
Snipping out the resolved bits.
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Meuric
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 3:27 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; rtg-...@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; rtg-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> m...@ietf.org
> Subject:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:09:10PM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Benjamin -
>
> Responses inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Benjamin Kaduk
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:46 PM
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-...@ietf.org; Christian
Alvaro –
Thanx for helping drive this to closure.
Please see inline.
From: Alvaro Retana
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:54 AM
To: Julien Meuric ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-...@ietf.org;
rtg-...@ietf.org; rtg-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
On September 27, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (
ginsb...@cisco.com) wrote:
Les:
Sometimes less is more. ;-)
My personal opinion is that, given the precedent from rfc4221, the
additional considerations are implied.
I’ll approve the publication either way once you and Julien
