Bruno,
> Waiting some more details, as per you below email, the IS-IS receiver does
> have a queue, sometimes dedicated to IS-IS, but in general relatively
> dedicated to very important and time sensitive traffic to the control plane.
> Details are indeed implementation specific. But in
Gentlebeings,
This discussion is producing far more heat than light. Can we please refocus
our attentions?
I think that we all agree that the legacy parameters are no longer serving us
well and that we need to reconsider our flooding parameters and mechanisms.
If we fail to reach a
Peter:
I just looked at this document once more time and found an error in §5:
s/The ERLD-MSD...[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext]./The
ERLD-MSD...[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd].
I am going to start the IETF LC, along with the OSPF document. No need to
address this
Thanks Peter!
This document looks good to me.
I’m a starting the IETF LC, along with the ISIS document.
Alvaro.
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
The IESG has received a request from the Link State Routing WG (lsr) to
consider the following document: - 'Signaling Entropy Label Capability and
Entropy Readable Label Depth
Using IS-IS'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
The IESG has received a request from the Link State Routing WG (lsr) to
consider the following document: - 'Signaling Entropy Label Capability and
Entropy Readable Label Depth
Using OSPF'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
Hello,
We updated the IS-IS Area Proxy draft with more details on SRv6 and TE
support. We'd appreciate your comments.
Thanks,
Sarah
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:46 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04.txt
To:
Les,
Thank you for this first answer. This is inline with my understanding of the
behavior.
I wish some of the behaviors and values (e.g. queue size, rate limiting) could
be shared. At minimum a range of typical values for platform which are not end
of sale. I don't think this is secret.
Les,
After nearly 2 months, can we expect an answer from your side?
More specifically, the below question
[Bruno] _Assuming_ that the parameters are static, the parameters proposed in
draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed are the same as the one implemented
(configured) on multiple
