Re: [Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

2020-05-21 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Kyle - Thanx for the review. Responses inline. > -Original Message- > From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 4:15 PM > To: tsv-...@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-te-app@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org > Subject: Tsvart last call review of

Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Alissa, On 20/05/2020 21:57, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote: Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines.

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Benjamin, thanks for review. Please see inline (##PP) two responses to OSPF specific comments. On 20/05/2020 00:43, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: Discuss When responding, please keep the

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Alvaro Retana
On May 21, 2020 at 6:05:41 AM, Peter Psenak wrote: Peter: Hi! > > -- > > DISCUSS: > > -- > > > > As for other reviewers, many of my comments duplicate those

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Peter Psenak
Benjamin, thanks for review, please see inline (##PP): On 20/05/2020 00:44, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Gyan, From: Gyan Mishra Date: Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 4:20 PM To: Acee Lindem Cc: Huaimo Chen , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call Yes and I have started reviewing the LSR mail

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Gyan Mishra
I think for both drafts it would be good to have a stick diagram at a minimum. I majored in EE with math minor and both drafts are hard to follow without a diagram with labels showing the exact topology examples. Four main topologies - full mesh, partial mesh and leaf spine ( 2 tier) and CLOS (

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Sarah Chen
Hi, Gyan, I presented https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-lsr-dynamic-flooding-algorithm-00.html in the last IETF. You may find the slides below helpful in understanding the algorithm:

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Gyan Mishra
Great Thanks Sarah!! Gyan On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:59 PM Sarah Chen wrote: > Hi, Gyan, > > I presented > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-lsr-dynamic-flooding-algorithm-00.html in > the last IETF. You may find the slides below helpful in understanding the > algorithm: > > >

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Peter, On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, Peter Psenak wrote: > Benjamin, > > thanks for review, please see inline (##PP): > > On 20/05/2020 00:44, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12:

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Gyan Mishra
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:01 AM Huaimo Chen wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > Thanks much for your questions. > > Gyan> How does this draft compare to the WG LC draft for flood > reduction. Would they be two eventual standard options in the operators > toolbox or competing features for optimized

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as WG Co-chair: Hi Gyan, I guess you’ve joined this discussion late. It might be a good idea to review the LSR mailing list archives. From: Gyan Mishra Date: Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:51 PM To: Huaimo Chen Cc: Acee Lindem , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:16:44PM +0200, Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > thanks for review. > > Please see inline (##PP) two responses to OSPF specific comments. > > > On 20/05/2020 00:43, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Gyan Mishra
Yes and I have started reviewing the LSR mail archives as I am late in the discussion for this. If you have link to any particular dates in the archives would be helpful. That sums up all the questions I have so if all answered in the archives then I am all set. I support the draft moving

Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Alissa Cooper
Thanks! Alissa > On May 21, 2020, at 3:51 AM, Peter Psenak wrote: > > Hi Alissa, > > On 20/05/2020 21:57, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote: >> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection >> When responding, please keep the subject

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Xufeng Liu
Support as a co-author. Thanks, - Xufeng On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:40 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > This begins a 3 week (due to holidays) WG adoption call for the “Flooding > Topology Computation Algorithm” draft. Please issue your support or > objection to this list by 11:59 PM, UTC on June

Re: [Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

2020-05-21 Thread Kyle Rose
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:28 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > * Update language? > > > > There are several places in which it is possible that normative language > in > > prior RFCs is revised. For example, in section 6.1, the last paragraph > states: > > > > New applications which future

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-05-21 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Alvaro, On 21/05/2020 13:44, Alvaro Retana wrote: On May 21, 2020 at 6:05:41 AM, Peter Psenak wrote: Peter: Hi! -- DISCUSS: -- As for other

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Gyan Mishra
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59 PM Huaimo Chen wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > Thanks much for your questions. My answers are inline below with [HC].. > > Best Regards, > Huaimo > -- > *From:* Gyan Mishra > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2020 11:14 AM > *To:* Huaimo Chen >

Re: [Lsr] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

2020-05-21 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Kyle – Inline. From: Kyle Rose Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 6:09 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: tsv-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-te-app@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13 On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:28 AM Les

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-05-21 Thread Huaimo Chen
Hi Gyan, Thanks much for your questions. Gyan> How does this draft compare to the WG LC draft for flood reduction. Would they be two eventual standard options in the operators toolbox or competing features for optimized flood reduction. Would having two flood reduction features