Hi all,
The authors are on-board with this round of suggestions from Les. Could I get
a review by one more of our Designated Experts before we update the draft?
Thanks,
Tony
> On Jun 29, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
>
> Tony –
>
> Inline.
>
> From: Tony Li
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : OSPF Prefix Originator Extensions
Authors : Aijun Wang
Acee Lindem
Hi All,
This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to review and
feedback.
Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject:
Hi All,
We've recently submitted an update to this draft with the following changes:
1) Introduced a new Prefix Originator Sub-TLV for carrying the reachable
address of the node originating the prefix advertisement. This is equivalent to
the similar ISIS extension -
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
Peter Psenak
Hello Acee/Chris,
The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this draft.
Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
-Original Message-
From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action:
Hi Bruno,
please see inline:
On 30/06/2020 16:53, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Hi all,
I can live with the current text, but I'm just raising the point for discussion
(better safe than sorry).
"16.1.1. IGP Algorithm Types Registry
This document makes the following registrations in
Hello Acee/Chris,
Would like to request for WG adoption for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles/
The draft was presented at IETF 105 and has not changed much since then. There
have been requests from operators using OSPF to provide the equivalent
functionality as
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes
Authors : Peter Psenak
Les Ginsberg
Hi all,
I can live with the current text, but I'm just raising the point for discussion
(better safe than sorry).
"16.1.1. IGP Algorithm Types Registry
This document makes the following registrations in the "IGP Algorithm Types"
registry:
Type: 128-255.
Description: Flexible
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your reply.
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> please see inline:
>
> On 30/06/2020 16:53, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I can live with the current text, but I'm just raising the point for
> > discussion
> (better
Hi Bruno,
On 30/06/2020 18:08, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your reply.
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Hi Bruno,
please see inline:
On 30/06/2020 16:53, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Hi all,
I can live with the current text, but I'm just
Speaking as WG chair:
I'm delighted to see discussion on a draft that isn't in WG last call.
Speaking as WG member:
Maybe I'm missing something but do we really think we’re going to run out of
non-flexible algorithms with 128? I just don't see it happening in my lifetime.
Thanks,
Acee
Hi Peter,
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> On 30/06/2020 18:08, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
> >> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> >>
> >> Hi Bruno,
> >>
> >> please see inline:
> >>
> >> On
14 matches
Mail list logo
