[Lsr] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

Hi Les, Roman, On 7/14/20, 7:15 AM, "Roman Danyliw" wrote: Hi Les and Acee! > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 11:43 PM > To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Roman Danyliw ; > The IESG > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

Rob - Thanx for the review. Responses inline. > -Original Message- > From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:25 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; > lsr@ietf.org; > Christian Hopps ;

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Linda, On 7/14/20, 1:26 PM, "Linda Dunbar" wrote: Acee, We have deployment of using BGP to group a set of SDWAN nodes as one entity and exchange link/paths/ports information among sites/nodes. TTZ could be another option. I don't see how it would work to replace BGP and RR

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Acee, Many networks have BGP or/and ISIS. Encoding of BGP messages are discussed in IDR WG, and the encoding of ISIS is discussed LSR WG. The TTZ zone draft is about ISIS encoding of TTZ, therefore, the discussion should be in the LSR Wg, instead of RTGwg (in my opinion). Maybe, the

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Linda, So the IS-IS runs over the overlay in your SDWAN solution? Have you deployed this? __ Acee On 7/14/20, 12:52 PM, "Linda Dunbar" wrote: Christian, The SDWAN use case is about grouping a set of nodes in geographically different locations to be one TTZ zone being treated as

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Acee, We have deployment of using BGP to group a set of SDWAN nodes as one entity and exchange link/paths/ports information among sites/nodes. TTZ could be another option. Linda -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 11:59 AM To: Linda Dunbar ;

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Christian, The SDWAN use case is about grouping a set of nodes in geographically different locations to be one TTZ zone being treated as one Virtual Node. Linda -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2020 6:42 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: Christian Hopps ;

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Linda, On 7/14/20, 1:57 PM, "Linda Dunbar" wrote: Acee, Many networks have BGP or/and ISIS. Encoding of BGP messages are discussed in IDR WG, and the encoding of ISIS is discussed LSR WG. The TTZ zone draft is about ISIS encoding of TTZ, therefore, the discussion should

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

Hi Les and Acee! > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 11:43 PM > To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Roman Danyliw ; > The IESG > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; aretana.i...@gmail.com; cho...@chopps.org; draft- > ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org;