[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network Authors : Chongfeng

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-yang-augmentation-v1-08.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF YANG Model Augmentations for Additional Features - Version 1 Authors : Acee Lindem

Re: [Lsr] [GROW] [Idr] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Hello Thomas, Many thx for your comments and review. See inline .. On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 7:13 AM wrote: > Dear Robert, > > > > I reviewed draft-raszuk-lsr-imp-00 and have some firsts comments and > suggestions. > > > > First of all, speaking as a network operator who is using BMP to gain >

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] [GROW] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Hi Acee, My questions were based on section 3.4 of the latest version of the draft. So I do not think I misinterpreted it. Thank you, R. On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:38 AM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > > *From: *Lsr on behalf of Robert Raszuk < > rob...@raszuk.net> > *Date:

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] [GROW] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Hi Robert, From: Lsr on behalf of Robert Raszuk Date: Sunday, July 10, 2022 at 1:32 PM To: Yingzhen Qu Cc: Gyan Mishra , Susan Hares , IDR List , "g...@ietf.org g...@ietf.org" , lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Idr] [GROW] IGP Monitoring Protocol Hi Yingzhen & OSPF-GT authors, UP front I must

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-10.txt

Hi, All: We have submitted the update version about "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" draft, which contains signification simplification for its contents and the clarification of some key points of the mechanism, based on the discussion on the list and off the list with LSR experts. We will

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] [GROW] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Hi Yingzhen & OSPF-GT authors, UP front I must state that anything is better to export IGP information from routers to interested nodes than using BGP for it. But to propose using OSPF to transport ISIS seems pretty brave :) I must admit it ! With that I have few questions to the proposal -

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Thanks Sue!We don’t have to always reinvent the wheel (at least not every time )I’m aware of at least 1 implementation streaming LSDB for TE consumers (gRPC)There are most probably some other vendor specific encodings/methods to steam to do that I believe – there has been some work around Kafka. 

Re: [Lsr] IETF 114 LSR Slot Request

Chairs, Authors of draft-white-lsr-distoptflood would like to request a slot for presentation in IETF 114. Draft: draft-white-lsr-distoptflood Time duration: 10 mins Rgds Shraddha Juniper Business Use Only From: Lsr On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 12:34 PM To:

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] [GROW] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Hi Yingzhen So with OSPFV2 using RFC 6549 would support multiple instances or OSPFV3 already supports instances, how is the GT instance differentiated from any other routed instance? For OSPFV2 it would use Opaque LSA Type 9,10,21 similar to RSVP-TE with an opaque option code for GTI. For

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] [GROW] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Hi Robert, Please think of OSPF-GT as a new protocol and it borrows ideas from OSPF. BGP-LS is one use case. In LSR WG, there have been proposals asking IGPs to carry non-routing information which will have impacts on protocol convergence, and OSPF-GT is meant to be the vehicle for such