Re: [Lsr] [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt

2018-07-09 Thread Haoyu song
Hi Randy, Thank you for comments on draft-song-ntf. I'm not sure I understand your second point. Could you please clarify it? Please note we didn't enforce any specific model on the telemetry yet. This doc only concerns the aspect on how to acquire data from networks. It does support the

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review

2018-07-09 Thread Loa Andersson
Folks, I agree - no reason to delay! There is one small difference between what is in the document and what is in the RFC I pointed to The document has "...as described in [BCP 14] [RFC2119] [RFC8174]..." While RFC has "...as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174]..." The reference list

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review

2018-07-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Peter, Strange, I'd remove the reference to [BCP14] since RFC 8174 and BCP 14 are the same document. I'm going to request publication as this certainly isn't enough to delay for an update. Thanks, Acee ´╗┐On 7/9/18, 8:26 AM, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" wrote: Hi Acee, that is

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review

2018-07-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Peter, The new boiler plate for requirements language, with references to both RFC 2119 and RFC 8174, is: 1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review

2018-07-09 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Yingzhen, thanks for your review. As regards to first IDNITS warning, not sure about the first one, I took the section "Requirements Language" from RFC8395 as suggested by Loa. RFC2119 is only referenced there, that should not be a problem though. I removed the reference to ISO10589.

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-hu-lsr-isis-path-mtu

2018-07-09 Thread Huzhibo
Hi Les & Acee: Yes, I agree with you, we will merge ISIS & OSPF extensions for Path MTU, and isis will reference RFC 7176. Ths ZhiBo Hu From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2018 12:52 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Huzhibo ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: Dailongfei