Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-05.txt

Hi authors, I just run idnits against version 05, and there is still a warning: Miscellaneous warnings: == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119

[Lsr] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval

Hi, Rob: If we use BGP-LS to get the underlay topology, we will not consider deployment other methods such as IGP adjacency or LSDB telemetry, although all of them are applicable. If we deploy BGP-LS adjacency with routers in multi-area to get the full multi-area topology, it will be no

[Lsr] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval

Hi, Peter: Actually, only the unnumbered scenario that you insisted has no straightforward solution for the topology reconstruction. As I had explained previously, unnumbered interface deployment is very seldom within our network, because it is unavailable for remote testing and management. If

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS Authors : Xiaohu Xu

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-15.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using OSPF Authors : Jeff Tantsura Uma

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1117133] Early Allocation Request for "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS"

Hi Amanda, It seems to me that we created the RFC 7684 TLV registry via early allocation so that we could allocate code points from other drafts. If this is, in fact, the case, we'll need to manage the IGP MSD Type in the WG. Thanks, Acee On 7/24/18, 4:25 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" wrote:

[Lsr] Early Allocation Request for "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS"

Hi Amanda, et al, Can we get the registry for “IGP MSD Types” created as well? We now have another draft allocating a code point. The IS-IS TLVs have already been allocated through the early allocation process. Hi Authors, Please change “MSD Types” to “IGP MSD Types” in the IANA section

Re: [Lsr] 答复: 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval

Hi Aijun, Your draft introduces the Source Router ID which is, by itself, an useful protocol extension. However, the use-case on inter-as topology retrieval has issues which has been shared by many of us at the mike, offline and on the list. Could you consider de-coupling the two? Also, if

Re: [Lsr] 答复: 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval

Hi Aijun, On 24/07/18 05:37 , Aijun Wang wrote: _Hi, Peter:_ For point-to-point interface, as described in OSPFv2(RFC2328 12.4.1.1. Describing point-to-point interfaces) , the router LSA will include two links description for each interface,