Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hi Spencer,
I'm replying as document shepherd.
On 12/4/18, 1:40 PM, "Spencer Dawkins" wrote:
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, howev
Pete, thanks for your review. Acee and Peter, thanks for your responses. I
entered a No Objection ballot. I can see Pete’s concern but I’m hopeful that
given the existing deployment experience and the added clarification in the -20
the concern will be mitigated in practice.
Alissa
> On Dec 3,
Hi Tom,
Let me try to explain.
On 12/4/18, 12:44 PM, "tom petch" wrote:
The router id in this I-D confuse me.
RFC8294 defines
typedef router-id { type yang:dotted-quad;
Some implementations configure a global router-id while others only allow it at
the control-plane-p
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, howev
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, how
The router id in this I-D confuse me.
RFC8294 defines
typedef router-id { type yang:dotted-quad;
ospf-yang defines
leaf ipv4-router-id { type inet:ipv4-address;
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types defines
typedef te-node-id { type yang:dotted-quad;
... This attribute is mapped to Ro
Hi Tom,
As always, thanks for your review and comments. Stephane has fixed most of your
comments. A couple comments below:
On 11/27/18, 6:10 AM, "tom petch" wrote:
Line length is within the RFC limit but the effect is to spread many of
the description clauses over multiple line
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Data Model for IS-IS protocol
Authors : Stephane Litkowski
Derek Yeung
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in
the PCE discovery
Authors : Diego R. Lopez
Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, ho
12 matches
Mail list logo
