Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Feb 11, 2019, 2:47 AM -0800, Christian Hopps , wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. > > The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a > way to signal dynamic flooding

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Support adoption (as co-author). I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 2:45 AM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org > Subject: [Lsr] WG

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Naiming Shen (naiming)
Support the adoption of the draft. Regards, - Naiming > On Feb 11, 2019, at 2:44 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. > > The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, support as coauthor. Not aware of any IPR at this point. thanks, Peter On 11/02/2019 11:44 , Christian Hopps wrote: Hi Folks, We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread steve ulrich
support. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:47 AM Christian Hopps wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. > > The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize > a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread David Allan I
Support -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 5:23 AM To: Christian Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll. Speaking as a

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Christian Hopps
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:19 AM, Lizhenbin wrote: > > Hi Chris, > 1. I have doubt about "The aim of this document is to describe the problem > space and standardize a way to signal dynamic flooding information.". Does > the aim mean the draft describes the problem space and standardize the

[Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Discussion - a naive question

2019-02-11 Thread Susan Hares
In working through the emails on the flooding reduction concepts, I have a few question: Is this work is simply for the spine-leaf topologies or for multiple topologies? . Does this work consider all of the following networks: spine-leaf data centers, 802.1 Provider Bridging, IPRAN

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Edward
Support. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:47 AM Christian Hopps wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. > > The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize > a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Robert Raszuk
Support. r. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:47 AM Christian Hopps wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. > > The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize > a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread tony . li
+1 as author. There is an IPR filing on this technology, specifying the “don’t sue us, we won’t sue you” language. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3361/ We are very interested in moving forward together on this work. Regards, Tony > On Feb 11,

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as a WG member: I support adoption of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 as infrastructure for flooding reduction mechanisms based on a separate flooding topology. Work on individual flooding reduction/topology determination algorithms can proceed in separate drafts. Thanks, Acee On

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-11 Thread Christian Hopps
Hi Folks, We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not standardize any specific algorithm for flooding topology creation.

Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]

2019-02-11 Thread Huzhibo
Support to promote the centralized and distributed solutions in two separated drafts. Best regards, Zhibo -Original Message- From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy) Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 4:47 PM To: Lizhenbin ; Christian Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]

2019-02-11 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Support moving forward with the centralized and distributed solutions specified in separated drafts. As discussed in previous mails, the procedure and protocol extensions needed for the two modes could be different, and a particular network may only want to use one mode. As for the centralized