Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt (adding contributors)

2019-04-10 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 11 April 2019 03:06 To: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Hannes Gredler Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per

Re: [Lsr] Min Links for Multiple Failures on Flooding Topology

2019-04-10 Thread tony . li
Hi Huaimo, Thank you for the example, this helps a lot. It’s clearer and I think it will help illuminate many things. Of course, it also generates more questions. In your algorithm you’re computing the full backup path to provide connectivity between the previously connected nodes (e.g., R0

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt (Corrected Author Alias)

2019-04-10 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Regards, Jeff > On Apr 10, 2019, at 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > LSR Working Group, > > This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter > your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday, > April 25th, 2019. >

Re: [Lsr] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions / draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensio

2019-04-10 Thread Alvaro Retana
On April 10, 2019 at 5:46:56 PM, Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) (martin.vigour...@nokia.com) wrote: Martin: Hi! It looks to me that you don’t disagree with what is written in the draft but rather with the fact that the draft may suggest that IGPs should do things which are in fact

Re: [Lsr] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions / draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensio

2019-04-10 Thread Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Alvaro, Thanks for your review. I’m not sure whether I should reply here or on the iesg’s list. It looks to me that you don’t disagree with what is written in the draft but rather with the fact that the draft may suggest that IGPs should do things which are in fact not specified in the IGPs

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt (adding contributors)

2019-04-10 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Authors, Contributors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt

2019-04-10 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email

[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt (Corrected Author Alias)

2019-04-10 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
LSR Working Group, This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday, April 25th, 2019. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org

[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt

2019-04-10 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
LSR Working Group, This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday, April 25th, 2019. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org

[Lsr] Fwd: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions / draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensi

2019-04-10 Thread Alvaro Retana
Hi! I just entered a DISCUSS position related to draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls (see below). I believe that the issue needs to be solved in conjunction with the IGP extension drafts, so I’m copying the authors/shepherds/chairs here. Thanks! Alvaro. On April 10, 2019 at 4:25:22 PM,

Re: [Lsr] Fwd: Open issues with Dynamic Flooding

2019-04-10 Thread tony . li
Hi Dave, > So for my edification/education, this is a general behavior that in the > absence of any specific algorithm is postulated. (?) Yes. > The piece I do not quite get is "adding until fixed". Is the working > assumption that things have broken down to the point that there is no >

Re: [Lsr] Fwd: Open issues with Dynamic Flooding

2019-04-10 Thread David Allan I
Hi Tony: So for my edification/education, this is a general behavior that in the absence of any specific algorithm is postulated. (?) The piece I do not quite get is "adding until fixed". Is the working assumption that things have broken down to the point that there is no synchronization of