Authors,
Now that this is a WG document, can we fix the draft title?
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr on behalf of Robert Raszuk
Date: Friday, May 31, 2019 at 6:18 PM
To: Paul Mattes
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-00
Hi Paul,
It has been pointed out about
Hi Paul,
It has been pointed out about month ago :)
Ref:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/hbmJqgpnfjcsxiD40AGaTMA2tic
Best,
R.
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:41 PM Paul Mattes wrote:
> I think there is a small issue with
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srvr-extensions-00. The title is:
>
>
>
>
I think there is a small issue with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srvr-extensions-00. The
title is:
IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane
I suspect that IS-IS works just fine for routing IPv6. The title should
probably be:
IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over IPv6
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6
Dataplane
Authors : Peter Psenak
