Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-02

2019-08-02 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Alvaro – Thanx for the meticulous review. As many of your comments are regarding content which is unchanged, I have one question for you: Where were you in 2004 when RFC 3847 was first published?  I agree with most of your comments – will prepare a new version to address them late next week

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-02

2019-08-02 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Alavaro, From: Lsr on behalf of Alvaro Retana Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 11:57 AM To: "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306...@ietf.org" Cc: "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , Uma Chunduri , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-02 Dear authors: I just finished

[Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-02

2019-08-02 Thread Alvaro Retana
Dear authors: I just finished reading this document. Thank you for your work on it. Why was it decided to create a bis document and not just an Update to rfc5306? Either way works for me, I'm just curious. Knowing that the change in this document, with respect to rfc5306, is new