[Lsr] Area Abstraction -> Area Proxy

2019-10-03 Thread tony . li
Hi all, We’ve posted a new draft today for your consideration. This was “Area Abstraction”. We’re renaming it to “Area Proxy”. The intent is the same. We’ve thrown away all need for tunneling. To do this, we’ve raised the requirement that the area be level-1-2. This seems simpler. We’ve

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09

2019-10-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Dhruv, On 03/10/2019 16:48, Peter Psenak wrote: (3) Section 3, Add reference to draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label for the definition and usage of ERLD ##PP The Introduction section has: "This capability, referred to as Entropy Readable Label Depth (ERLD) as defined

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09

2019-10-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Dhruv, On 03/10/2019 16:14, Dhruv Dhody wrote: Hi Peter, Snipping to open points... (1) Please use updated requirement language text as per RFC 8174, as you do have a mix of upper-case and lower-case terms in your I-D. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09

2019-10-03 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Peter, Snipping to open points... > > (1) Please use updated requirement language text as per RFC 8174, as you do > > have a mix of upper-case and lower-case terms in your I-D. > > > >The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL > >NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09

2019-10-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Dhruv, please see inline (##PP) On 12/09/2019 12:11, Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody Review result: Has Issues Subject: RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09 Hello I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.