Hi Tim
Thank you for your review and comments.
See below PPE.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:22 PM Tim Chown via Datatracker
wrote:
> Reviewer: Tim Chown
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
> ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documen
Reviewer: Tim Chown
Review result: Has Nits
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments
Thanks Robert,
Nothing new on the bgp-ls being able to carry link state ;) - rfc7752 even
states it..
“ .. a mechanism by which link-state and TE
information can be collected from networks and shared with external
components using the BGP routing protocol..”
Thanks for sharing your initia
Hi Alvaro, Acee
Ack, I will spin a new version with the review comments and will add the
new bullet.
Thanks everyone for your valuable feedback and comments!
Padma
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:06 AM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Alvaro,
>
> On 11/7/19, 11:58 AM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote:
>
>
Hi Alvaro,
On 11/7/19, 11:58 AM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote:
On November 3, 2019 at 2:28:29 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote:
Padma:
Hi!
See below...
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 7:03 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:50:45PM -0700, Padma
On November 3, 2019 at 2:28:29 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote:
Padma:
Hi!
See below...
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 7:03 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:50:45PM -0700, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:47 PM Kyle Rose via Datatracker
> > > wrote:
>
*> Once advertised in the network using a suitable link state protocol
> (such as OSPF, ISIS or BGP-LS),*
Whow ... never imagined that BGP-LS would be called one day a "link
state protocol" and an equal sign would be made to OSPF and ISIS.
Best,
Robert.
PS. As to the proposal in draft its
