Re: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

2019-12-05 Thread meicong
Hi Acee, Thanks for your answer. In the example, If the type-5 lsa is originated by the ASBR that in the normal area, the other router in the normal area will use the type-5 lsa, for the ASBR is reachable in the normal area, and there is (128.185.1.0, 0xff00) inter-area route that be orignated

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-11: (with COMMENT)

2019-12-05 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:22:53AM -0800, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote: > Hi Ben > > Thanks for your thorough review. > > See below PPE for my comments > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:45 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following

[Lsr] IETF 106 LSR Working Group Meeting Minutes

2019-12-05 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
I’ve uploaded the IETF 106 LSR minutes at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-lsr-00 Please send me any additions or corrections. Thanks much to Yingzhen Qu for compiling the minutes. As you can see, we had quite a lot of lively discussion during the sessions –

Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

2019-12-05 Thread tony . li
I support WG adoption of this document. Tony > On Nov 25, 2019, at 4:27 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > This begins a two week LSR Working Group adoption call for the subject > document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric/ >

Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-11: (with COMMENT)

2019-12-05 Thread Barry Leiba
Thanks, Padma... the new paragraph now seems completely clear to me! Thanks for the work on this. Barry On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:03 AM Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote: > > Hi Barry > > Thank you for your review > > See below PPE for my comments > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:47 PM Barry Leiba via

Re: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

2019-12-05 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Meicong, From: Lsr on behalf of meicong Date: Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 4:48 AM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-nssa-upd...@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101 Hi All, Could you please provide clarification for following section 2.5.(3) in rfc3101.

[Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

2019-12-05 Thread meicong
Hi All, Could you please provide clarification for following section 2.5.(3) in rfc3101. If the forwarding address is non-zero look up the forwarding address in the routing table. For a Type-5 LSA the matching routing table entry must specify an intra-area or

Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

2019-12-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
+1 – I also support the adoption of this document by the WG. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: 05 December 2019 11:13 To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps Subject: Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" -