Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Jeff Tantsura
I support the adoption, finally OSPF would catch up with IS-IS ;-) Cheers, Jeff On Dec 13, 2019, 3:28 AM -0800, Christian Hopps , wrote: > Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, > > This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Jeff Tantsura
I support the adoption Cheers, Jeff On Dec 13, 2019, 3:54 AM -0800, Christian Hopps , wrote: > Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, > > This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/ > > Please indicate your

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
I support adoption of this draft. Although many implementations have added strict mode support based only on local configuration, given that the adjacency state machine is altered it seems long overdue that protocol extensions be defined so there is more robust interoperability. Les >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
I support adoption of this draft. Similar functionality in IS-IS (RFC 8500) has proven useful. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 3:28 AM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-met...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as a WG member, I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 12/13/19, 6:55 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as a WG member, I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 12/13/19, 6:29 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
I support the adoption of the document as a co-author and I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 13 December 2019 17:25 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Peter Psenak
I support this document adoption as a co-author and I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. thanks, Peter On 13/12/2019 12:54, Christian Hopps wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Peter Psenak
I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. thanks, Peter On 13/12/2019 12:48, Peter Psenak wrote: Hi Chris, as coauthor, I support the WG adoption of this document. thanks, Peter On 13/12/2019 12:28, Christian Hopps wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
I support this document adoption as a co-author and I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 13 December 2019 16:58 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-met...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Christian Hopps
Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/ Please indicate your support or objection by Dec 27th. Authors, please respond indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that

[Lsr] The LSR WG has placed draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2019-12-13 Thread IETF Secretariat
The LSR WG has placed draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Christian Hopps) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/ ___ Lsr mailing list

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, as coauthor, I support the WG adoption of this document. thanks, Peter On 13/12/2019 12:28, Christian Hopps wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric/

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Christian Hopps
Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric/ Please indicate your support or objection by Dec 27th. Authors, please respond indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that

[Lsr] The LSR WG has placed draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2019-12-13 Thread IETF Secretariat
The LSR WG has placed draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Christian Hopps) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric/ ___ Lsr mailing list