[Lsr] Questions about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-06

2020-02-28 Thread peng.shaofu
Hi Peter Please see the difference rules of TE metric in Flex-algo draft and RFC5305. For the link without TE metric attribute, in Flex-algo draft it will be excluded from FA plane that configured TE metric type, but in RFC5305 the IGP metric of the link can be as replacement. Please

[Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-12

2020-02-28 Thread Alvaro Retana
Dear authors: This is my review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-12.  I reviewed this document alongside draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10, so many comments are the same/similar.  Thank you for the work in both of them! I will progress both documents together, so I will wait for both of them to address my

[Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10

2020-02-28 Thread Alvaro Retana
Dear authors: This is my review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10.  I reviewed this document alongside draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-12, so many comments are the same/similar.  Thank you for the work in both of them! Besides the in-line comments, I want to point out here that this specification is

[Lsr] 答复: IETF 107 LSR Presentation Slot Requests

2020-02-28 Thread wangyali
Dear chairs, secretary and all, This is Yali. It’s my honor to give a remote presentation for two new drafts (draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-00 and draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-00) and request duration around 15 min for these two draft. Everyone is welcome to give

[Lsr] lsr - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 107

2020-02-28 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Acee Lindem, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. lsr Session 1 (2:00 requested) Monday, 23 March 2020, Afternoon Session I 1330-1530 Room Name: Regency F size: 150

[Lsr] IETF 107 LSR Presentation Slot Requests

2020-02-28 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi all, We're now accepting agenda request for the LSR Working Grouping meeting IETF 107. Please send your requests to lsr-cha...@ietf.org indicating draft name, speaker, and desired duration (covering presentation and discussion). If you plan to present remotely, please let us know so we can

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-28 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Ketan, Thanks fort the follow up. Clarification inline [Bruno] From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 11:11 AM To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant); Chris Bowers Cc: lsr@ietf.org; SPRING WG List;

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-28 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Bruno, I believe the description and usage of Locator is very well described and covered in the net-pgm draft as also the corresponding IGP extensions. Is the question is more about the “block” part of it (what is not in the block part is in the node part as per the text in the net-pgm

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-28 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Ketan, From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 6:30 AM Hi Chris, I agree with Peter and I would suggest to drop LSR since this is not a protocol specific thing. I believe the text in