Re: [Lsr] A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02

2020-03-09 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Yali - What is missing for me is an explanation of why IFIT Capability information is something that is appropriate to be sent using IGP Router Capability advertisements. Generally speaking, we prefer to restrict IGP advertisements to information which is of direct use to the protocol.

[Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03.txt

2020-03-09 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi all, Following many interesting discussions on the mailing list, during IETF meetings 105 & 106 and of-list, please find below an updated version. Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed Diff:

Re: [Lsr] "Legal" endpoint behaviors [draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-06.txt]

2020-03-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Peter, Chris, I agree that a number of IS-IS IANA registries have this level of specification. For example: https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-22-23-25-141-222-223 Thanks, Acee ´╗┐On 3/9/20, 8:28 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian

Re: [Lsr] "Legal" endpoint behaviors [draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-06.txt]

2020-03-09 Thread Christian Hopps
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 6:36 AM, Peter Psenak > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > On 07/03/2020 15:46, Christian Hopps wrote: >> 1) I think we should have an IANA registry instead of just a table defined >> in section 10 of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-06. >> The registry could be

Re: [Lsr] bad xrefs [Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-06.txt]

2020-03-09 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, you are right, there are some errors in cross-references, I'll fix them in next version. thanks, Peter On 07/03/2020 15:17, Christian Hopps wrote: I'm finding cross-references in this document to be incorrect, is something wrong with the XML to foo generation? For example:

Re: [Lsr] "Legal" endpoint behaviors [draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-06.txt]

2020-03-09 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, On 07/03/2020 15:46, Christian Hopps wrote: 1) I think we should have an IANA registry instead of just a table defined in section 10 of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-06. The registry could be cross-referenced by and to "SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors" for each protocol carrying

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02

2020-03-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Yali, A couple of very basic comments on these drafts. They are definitely not ready for consideration. 1. IFIT is never expanded as an acronym. Seems it should be as early as the title. OSPF extensions for Advertising In-Situ Flow Information Telemetry (IFIT) Capability

[Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02

2020-03-09 Thread wangyali
Dear all, I'm Yali. Following is a new version of I-D, draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02 I submitted recently. Please let me know your questions and comments. Thank you. >>> Name: draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability Revision: 02 Title: Extensions

[Lsr] A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02

2020-03-09 Thread wangyali
Dear all, I'm Yali. Following is a new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02 I submitted recently. Please let me know your questions and comments. Thank you. > Name: draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability Revision: 02 Title: