On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:03 AM wrote:
> Tony, all,
>
>
>
> Thanks Tony for the technical and constructive feedback.
>
> Please inline [Bruno]
>
>
>
> *From:* Tony Przygienda [mailto:tonysi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 22, 2020 1:19 AM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:*
Les,
Please see inline
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:48 PM
To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Flow Control Discussion for IS-IS Flooding Speed
Bruno -
You have made an assumption that historically vendors have
Tony, all,
Thanks Tony for the technical and constructive feedback.
Please inline [Bruno]
From: Tony Przygienda [mailto:tonysi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 1:19 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flow Control Discussion for
Speaking as WG member:
In the past, we developed protocol encodings that afforded future
extendibility. I don't see the problem with the including the SID structure
sub-sub-TLV and would support progression.
Thanks,
Acee
On 4/10/20, 2:45 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Derek Yeung" wrote:
Hi,
