Hi, Thank you Chris for emphasizing that congestion control is hard and more reference may be necessary. And as the the follow-up of my comments in the interim meeting, I would like to make my question more clear: In congestion control of layer 4, it is assumed that there is a bottleneck in
Hi all, Following the meeting today, and the first results with existing algorithm, it would a priori be interesting to have simulations or implementations tests results on the proposed algorithms. This email is a call to for info / contribution on this. - Do you know research
All Are we having an interim meeting today. Please forward webex link. The Link State Routing (lsr) Working Group will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2020-04-29 from 10:00 to 12:00 America/Detroit. Agenda: Second LSR Virtual IETF 107 meeting date. Thanks Gyan Verizon Cell 301 502-1347 --
[As WG member] I like the start these drafts are making, I have a few thoughts. - I think its worthwhile work and as a WG we should end up adopting a draft or drafts that try to solve the problem. - Congestion control is hard, and a very well studied problem, as such whatever we end up should
Hi Mohit, From: Mohit Sethi M Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 2:29 AM To: Acee Lindem , "gen-...@ietf.org" Cc: "email@example.com" , "firstname.lastname@example.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11 HI Acee, On 4/24/20 3:38 PM,
Hi Acee, Please see inline [Yali2]. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 4:20 AM To: wangyali ; email@example.com Subject: Re: [Lsr] 答复: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-01.txt Hi Yali, See [Acee].
HI Acee, On 4/24/20 3:38 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Hi Mohit, Speaking as document shepherd. See inline. On 4/24/20, 3:39 AM, "Mohit Sethi via Datatracker"
wrote: Reviewer: Mohit Sethi Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART