Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

2020-06-03 Thread Loa Andersson
Amanda, Thanks, for the clarification. I have not had to manage code point allocation for Expert Review registries and had not looked at 7370. Small question, if you do the hybrid early allocation and then 6 months later the document is is approved as an RFC is that the time when you mark

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread wangyali
Hi Peter, Please see inline . Thanks. -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 11:04 PM To: wangyali ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt Yali, On 03/06/2020 15:51, wangyali wrote: > Hi

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-06-03 Thread Kiran Makhijani
Support WG adoption. Regards, Kiran From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 12:40 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call This begins a 3 week (due to holidays) WG

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 IPR Poll

2020-06-03 Thread Yi Yang
Hi Acee, I am not aware of any IPRs applying to draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08. Best Regards, Yi On 5/15/20 3:47 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08.txt. If so, has this IPR been disclosed in

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm - draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call

2020-06-03 Thread Yi Yang
Support. Yi On 5/15/20 3:39 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: This begins a 3 week (due to holidays) WG adoption call for the “Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm” draft. Please issue your support or objection to this list by 11:59 PM, UTC on June 5^th , 2020. Here is a URL for your

[Lsr] Request WG Adoption of draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02.txt

2020-06-03 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
WG Chairs - This draft has been around for a few years now. It makes a minor change to RFC 5316 to allow support in an IPv6 only network (no IPv4 support). It is the Inter AS equivalent to the work already completed for Router Capabilities (RFC 7981). Could you please start a WG adoption call

[Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02.txt

2020-06-03 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Folks - This is a refresh on this draft. Les -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 6:56 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Stefano Previdi ; Mach Chen (Guoyi) ; Mach Chen ; Xiaodong Duan Subject: New Version Notification for

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12

2020-06-03 Thread Daniele Ceccarelli
Hi Peter, Please see in line. BR Daniele -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak Sent: den 1 juni 2020 12:15 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse@ietf.org Subject: Re: Rtgdir last call review of

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Yali, On 03/06/2020 15:51, wangyali wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for your reply. please see inline . -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 7:44 PM To: wangyali ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action:

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread wangyali
Hi Acee, Thanks for your kind suggestion. Best regards, Yali -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 9:46 PM To: wangyali ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt Speaking as WG chair: It

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread wangyali
Hi Peter, Thanks for your reply. please see inline . -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 7:44 PM To: wangyali ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt Yali, On 03/06/2020 13:35, wangyali

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as WG chair: It seems were getting a number of questions and comments on these ELC signaling documents as they go to the RFC Queue. I'd like to encourage review and discussion of LSR documents earlier in the WG process. One way to facilitate this would be for the authors to solicit

Re: [Lsr] A question about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2020-06-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Zhibo, n 03/06/2020 14:40, Huzhibo wrote: Hi Alexander, Peter: Thank you very much,After I read the WG alias, I still have a lot of doubts, can we calculate the disjoint path by exclude  SRLG in flexalgo? In fact, unless you previously defined two disjoint planes using SRLG, you

Re: [Lsr] A question about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2020-06-03 Thread Huzhibo
Hi Alexander, Peter: Thank you very much,After I read the WG alias, I still have a lot of doubts, can we calculate the disjoint path by exclude SRLG in flexalgo? In fact, unless you previously defined two disjoint planes using SRLG, you cannot guarantee that different FlexAlgo can

Re: [Lsr] A question about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2020-06-03 Thread Alexander Vainshtein
Hi Zhibo Hu, Welcome to the club - I have already asked the same question and got a response from Peter. You can find the relevant email thread here. My 2c, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email:

Re: [Lsr] A question about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2020-06-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Zhibo, this has been explained in the WG alias already. Can you please go over archives. thanks, Peter On 03/06/2020 14:06, Huzhibo wrote: Hi Peter: I noticed that draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-07 adds exclude SRLG TLV. SRLG defines a group of risk-sharing link groups. It is generally used

[Lsr] A question about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2020-06-03 Thread Huzhibo
Hi Peter: I noticed that draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-07 adds exclude SRLG TLV. SRLG defines a group of risk-sharing link groups. It is generally used to prevent the primary and standby paths from passing the same risk-sharing link group .I don't know why a group of SRLG links should be excluded

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Yali, On 03/06/2020 13:35, wangyali wrote: Hi authors, After reading this draft, I am not clear with following points. First, as said " Even though ELC is a property of the node, in some cases it is advantageous to associate and advertise the ELC with a prefix.", what are "some cases" in

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

2020-06-03 Thread wangyali
Hi authors, After reading this draft, I am not clear with following points. First, as said " Even though ELC is a property of the node, in some cases it is advantageous to associate and advertise the ELC with a prefix.", what are "some cases" in which it is advantageous to associate and

Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

2020-06-03 Thread tom petch
From: Lsr on behalf of Loa Andersson Sent: 03 June 2020 08:20 Tony, I guess that this shows that we should take care naming our registries. In line please- On 02/06/2020 23:24, tony...@tony.li wrote: > > Hi Loa, > >> The code points are requested from "the IS-IS TLV Codepoints registry", >>

Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

2020-06-03 Thread Loa Andersson
Tony, I guess that this shows that we should take care naming our registries. In line please- On 02/06/2020 23:24, tony...@tony.li wrote: Hi Loa, The code points are requested from "the IS-IS TLV Codepoints registry", howver the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" is a name space with 14 different