I would support the IS-IS TTZ solution for WG adoption.
Of course, obviously not with OSPF encodings or concepts only relevant to
OSPF (thx for the updated version).
Thanks for the good work which was started way back on TTZs with OSPF
protocol first (RFC 8099).
I will send my specific
IS-IS TTZ is useful and I support the adoption of the TTZ draft too.
Thanks!
Haoyu
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 1:40 PM
To: LEI LIU ; Huaimo Chen
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ
I also support the adoption of TTZ draft.
The
I also support the adoption of TTZ draft.
The Virtual Zone concept would be very useful for the Overlay networks. The
proposed TTZ can group a set of nodes not geographically together into one
virtual area to scale virtual overlay networks with lots of nodes. Those kind
overlay networks are
I support the adoption of the TTZ draft.
The operation on TTZ is simple. Smooth transferring between a zone and a
single node will improve customer experience. The work on TTZ should be
moved forward.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Lei
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:38 PM Huaimo Chen
wrote:
> Hi Chris and
I support adoption of the IS-IS TTZ draft.
It seems more flexible and capable although some
editorial/nomenclature improvements in the draft would be good. I will
send some more detailed suggestions to the authors.
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IGP Flexible Algorithm
Authors : Peter Psenak
Shraddha Hegde
